<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Initial Reactions to the Apple iPad: No Flash in the iPan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mslk.com/reactions/initial-reactions-to-the-apple-ipad-no-flash-in-the-ipan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mslk.com/reactions/initial-reactions-to-the-apple-ipad-no-flash-in-the-ipan/</link>
	<description>reactions from a design firm in queens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MSLK.com: Going Mobile in a Flash Unfriendly World</title>
		<link>http://mslk.com/reactions/initial-reactions-to-the-apple-ipad-no-flash-in-the-ipan/comment-page-1/#comment-15032</link>
		<dc:creator>MSLK.com: Going Mobile in a Flash Unfriendly World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mslk.com/reactions/initial-reactions-to-the-apple-ipad-no-flash-in-the-ipan/#comment-15032</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple&#8217;s iPhone captures the largest percentage of mobile users, and with the launch of the latest iPhone and iPad, we can only expect those numbers to increase. What does that mean for you? It means that any Flash technology on your website won&#8217;t be visible on a mobile device. To read my previous thoughts on why Apple isn&#8217;t playing friendly with Flash you can read this article here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple&#8217;s iPhone captures the largest percentage of mobile users, and with the launch of the latest iPhone and iPad, we can only expect those numbers to increase. What does that mean for you? It means that any Flash technology on your website won&#8217;t be visible on a mobile device. To read my previous thoughts on why Apple isn&#8217;t playing friendly with Flash you can read this article here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheri</title>
		<link>http://mslk.com/reactions/initial-reactions-to-the-apple-ipad-no-flash-in-the-ipan/comment-page-1/#comment-10622</link>
		<dc:creator>sheri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mslk.com/reactions/initial-reactions-to-the-apple-ipad-no-flash-in-the-ipan/#comment-10622</guid>
		<description>Even though I find the iPad to be a giant belly flop, I have to agree that it&#039;s certainly another nail in the coffin for Flash. 

Apple didn&#039;t want to pay Adobe the licensing royalties to have Flash installed on every phone. 

And Apple doesn&#039;t want you to play Flash games on the internet when you should be downloading their apps. 

So Flash is now the odd man out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I find the iPad to be a giant belly flop, I have to agree that it&#8217;s certainly another nail in the coffin for Flash. </p>
<p>Apple didn&#8217;t want to pay Adobe the licensing royalties to have Flash installed on every phone. </p>
<p>And Apple doesn&#8217;t want you to play Flash games on the internet when you should be downloading their apps. </p>
<p>So Flash is now the odd man out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
